RotoGrinders vs Teamworks
RotoGrinders vs Teamworks, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: RotoGrinders is on 54/100 and Teamworks on 55/100.
Where each one leads
RotoGrinders
- agent readiness: 40/100 against 33/100
- funding raised: $21.0M against $10.0M
Teamworks
- domain rating: 75/100 against 61/100
- headcount: 752 against 73
At a glance
| Measure | RotoGrinders | Teamworks |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Daily fantasy sports content, tools, and community for serious players. | Teamworks is a platform for sports teams. |
| Category | Sports Tech, Fantasy Sports, Data Analytics, Content Platform | Sports Tech, Vertical SaaS, Workflow Automation, Communication Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2009 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Charlotte, United States | Durham, Australia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | RotoGrinders | Teamworks |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 73 | 752 |
| Total funding | $21.0M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Acquisition | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 34,407 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | RotoGrinders | Teamworks |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 15/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 61/100 | 75/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | RotoGrinders | Teamworks |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Alpinejs, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
RotoGrinders vs Teamworks: common questions
Which is better, RotoGrinders or Teamworks?
On our 0-100 score Teamworks rates higher (55/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do RotoGrinders and Teamworks compare on the numbers?
RotoGrinders leads on agent readiness (40/100 against 33/100), funding raised ($21.0M against $10.0M). Teamworks leads on domain rating (75/100 against 61/100), headcount (752 against 73).
Read the full RotoGrinders review and pricing or the Teamworks review and pricing. You can also browse other RotoGrinders alternatives we track.