Rookout vs Groundcover
Rookout vs Groundcover, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Rookout is on 63/100 and Groundcover on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Rookout
- agent readiness: 60/100 against 52/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 68/100
Groundcover
- headcount: 129 against 21
- headcount growth: +65.9% against -30.6%
- funding raised: $155M against $20.2M
At a glance
| Measure | Rookout | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Live debugging platform for engineers to solve customer issues faster in any environment. | Kubernetes application monitoring using eBPF for deep visibility and performance insights, offering a cloud-native observability platform. |
| Category | Enterprise, Development, DevOps, Observability | Observability, Cloud Infrastructure, Application Performance Monitoring, Infrastructure Monitoring |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Rookout | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 21 | 129 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -30.6% | +65.9% |
| Total funding | $20.2M | $155M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $500M |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,090 | 9,827 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Rookout | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 50/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 48/100 | 51/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (60/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Rookout | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Nuxt, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Rookout | Groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread |
“We’re part of the founding engineering team at groundcover, building a modern, cloud-native observability platform that’s redefining how teams monitor and troubleshoot applications in Kubernetes environments. Our engineering efforts focus o”r/devops
Rookout vs Groundcover: common questions
Which is better, Rookout or Groundcover?
On our 0-100 score Groundcover rates higher (64/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Rookout and Groundcover compare on the numbers?
Rookout leads on agent readiness (60/100 against 52/100), domain rating (83/100 against 68/100). Groundcover leads on headcount (129 against 21), headcount growth (+65.9% against -30.6%), funding raised ($155M against $20.2M).
What do real users say about Rookout and Groundcover?
Groundcover: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/devops.
Read the full Rookout review and pricing or the Groundcover review and pricing. You can also browse other Rookout alternatives we track.