Risk Ledger vs SecurityScorecard
Risk Ledger vs SecurityScorecard, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Risk Ledger is on 58/100 and SecurityScorecard on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Risk Ledger
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
SecurityScorecard
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 627 against 91
- funding raised: $50.0M against $32.0M
- LinkedIn following: 66,857 against 6,713
At a glance
| Measure | Risk Ledger | SecurityScorecard |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automates third-party risk management for enterprises through continuous monitoring and data intelligence. | Security rating firm providing insights into widespread vulnerabilities in OpenClaw deployments. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Third-Party Risk Management, Supply Chain Security | Security, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Security Ratings |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2013 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Risk Ledger | SecurityScorecard |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 91 | 627 |
| Total funding | $32.0M | $50.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,713 | 66,857 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Risk Ledger | SecurityScorecard |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 70/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Risk Ledger | SecurityScorecard |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Risk Ledger vs SecurityScorecard: common questions
Which is better, Risk Ledger or SecurityScorecard?
On our 0-100 score SecurityScorecard rates higher (61/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Risk Ledger and SecurityScorecard compare on the numbers?
SecurityScorecard leads on agent readiness (49/100 against 38/100), domain rating (78/100 against 55/100), headcount (627 against 91), funding raised ($50.0M against $32.0M), LinkedIn following (66,857 against 6,713).
Read the full Risk Ledger review and pricing or the SecurityScorecard review and pricing. You can also browse other Risk Ledger alternatives we track.