RevenueCat vs Stax Payments
RevenueCat vs Stax Payments, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: RevenueCat is on 51/100 and Stax Payments on 64/100.
Where each one leads
RevenueCat
- domain rating: 89/100 against 74/100
Stax Payments
- our overall score: 64/100 against 51/100
- funding raised: $245M against $50.0M
At a glance
| Measure | RevenueCat | Stax Payments |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Subscription infrastructure for mobile apps, simplifying in-app purchases and subscriptions. | Integrated payment processing and recurring billing solutions for software platforms and businesses. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Developer Tools, API Platform | Fintech, Payments, Embedded Finance, Subscription Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Orlando, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | RevenueCat | Stax Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 292 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -15.3% |
| Open roles | 18 | Not published |
| Total funding | $50.0M | $245M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series D |
| Valuation | $500M | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 21,031 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | RevenueCat | Stax Payments |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 10/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 18/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 89/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | RevenueCat | Stax Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Payments | Revenuecat | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
RevenueCat vs Stax Payments: common questions
Which is better, RevenueCat or Stax Payments?
On our 0-100 score Stax Payments rates higher (64/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do RevenueCat and Stax Payments compare on the numbers?
RevenueCat leads on domain rating (89/100 against 74/100). Stax Payments leads on our overall score (64/100 against 51/100), funding raised ($245M against $50.0M).
Read the full RevenueCat review and pricing or the Stax Payments review and pricing. You can also browse other RevenueCat alternatives we track.