Remark Holdings vs Scandit
Remark Holdings vs Scandit, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Remark Holdings is on 29/100 and Scandit on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Remark Holdings
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Scandit
- our overall score: 67/100 against 29/100
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 33/100
- funding raised: $268M against $201M
At a glance
| Measure | Remark Holdings | Scandit |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered analytics and security solutions for businesses and public spaces. | Smart data capture platform using computer vision and AR for enterprise workflows. |
| Category | Computer Vision, AI Infrastructure, Analytics Platform, Security | Computer Vision, Augmented Reality, Enterprise Software, Barcode Scanning |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 1997 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Las Vegas, United States | Zurich, Switzerland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Remark Holdings | Scandit |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 359 |
| Total funding | $201M | $268M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 82,902 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Remark Holdings | Scandit |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 29/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 10/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 5/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 33/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Remark Holdings | Scandit |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Remark Holdings vs Scandit: common questions
Which is better, Remark Holdings or Scandit?
On our 0-100 score Scandit rates higher (67/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Remark Holdings and Scandit compare on the numbers?
Scandit leads on our overall score (67/100 against 29/100), agent readiness (54/100 against 35/100), domain rating (73/100 against 33/100), funding raised ($268M against $201M).
Read the full Remark Holdings review and pricing or the Scandit review and pricing. You can also browse other Remark Holdings alternatives we track.