Relatient vs Spencer Health Solutions
Relatient vs Spencer Health Solutions, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Relatient is on 6/100 and Spencer Health Solutions on 40/100.
Where each one leads
Relatient
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 3/100
Spencer Health Solutions
- our overall score: 40/100 against 6/100
At a glance
| Measure | Relatient | Spencer Health Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A patient engagement platform for healthcare organizations focused on self-scheduling and patient communication. | Remote patient monitoring and virtual care solutions for chronic disease management. |
| Category | HealthTech, Healthcare IT, Patient Engagement, Scheduling Software | HealthTech, MedTech, Telemedicine, Remote Patient Monitoring |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B SaaS | B2B |
| Offering | Not published | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Nashville, United States | Chicago, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Relatient | Spencer Health Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | Not published | $10.5M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Relatient | Spencer Health Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 6/100 | 40/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 35/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 13/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 50/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 3/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Relatient | Spencer Health Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Relatient vs Spencer Health Solutions: common questions
Which is better, Relatient or Spencer Health Solutions?
On our 0-100 score Spencer Health Solutions rates higher (40/100 against 6/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Relatient and Spencer Health Solutions compare on the numbers?
Relatient leads on agent readiness (53/100 against 31/100), domain rating (62/100 against 3/100). Spencer Health Solutions leads on our overall score (40/100 against 6/100).
Read the full Relatient review and pricing or the Spencer Health Solutions review and pricing. You can also browse other Relatient alternatives we track.