Redwood Materials vs Refurbed
Redwood Materials vs Refurbed, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Redwood Materials is on 59/100 and Refurbed on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Redwood Materials
- our overall score: 59/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 773 against 286
- funding raised: $1.1B against $167M
- LinkedIn following: 78,725 against 30,083
Refurbed
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Redwood Materials | Refurbed |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Recycling and refining battery materials for electric vehicles and energy storage. | Refurbed is a leading European online marketplace for refurbished electronics. |
| Category | Battery Technology, Energy Storage, EV Charging, Climate Tech | Circular Economy, E-commerce, Marketplace, Consumer Electronics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Services | Marketplace |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Carson City, United States | Vienna, Austria |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Redwood Materials | Refurbed |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 773 | 286 |
| Total funding | $1.1B | $167M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 78,725 | 30,083 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Redwood Materials | Refurbed |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 50/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Redwood Materials | Refurbed |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Nuxt | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Microsoft Clarity |
Redwood Materials vs Refurbed: common questions
Which is better, Redwood Materials or Refurbed?
On our 0-100 score Redwood Materials rates higher (59/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Redwood Materials and Refurbed compare on the numbers?
Redwood Materials leads on our overall score (59/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 22/100), headcount (773 against 286), funding raised ($1.1B against $167M), LinkedIn following (78,725 against 30,083).
Read the full Redwood Materials review and pricing or the Refurbed review and pricing. You can also browse other Redwood Materials alternatives we track.