Redis vs Silk
Redis vs Silk, compared side by side on 25 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Redis is on 75/100 and Silk on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Redis
- our overall score: 75/100 against 63/100
- agent readiness: 72/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 1,515 against 490
- funding raised: $907M against $238M
- LinkedIn following: 293,456 against 5,024
Silk
- headcount growth: +25.0% against +4.8%
At a glance
| Measure | Redis | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Redis is an open-source, in-memory data platform used as a database, cache, and message broker, powering real-time applications at scale. | Silk provides a data virtualization platform for cloud workloads, accelerating performance without refactoring. |
| Category | Database, In-Memory Database, Cache, Message Broker | Database, Enterprise, Optimization, Virtualization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Redis | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,515 | 490 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.8% | +25.0% |
| Total funding | $907M | $238M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series G |
| Valuation | $2.0B | $550M |
| LinkedIn followers | 293,456 | 5,024 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Redis | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 75/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 87/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | B (72/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Redis | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Redis vs Silk: common questions
Which is better, Redis or Silk?
On our 0-100 score Redis rates higher (75/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 25 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Redis and Silk compare on the numbers?
Redis leads on our overall score (75/100 against 63/100), agent readiness (72/100 against 21/100), domain rating (90/100 against 50/100), headcount (1,515 against 490), funding raised ($907M against $238M), LinkedIn following (293,456 against 5,024). Silk leads on headcount growth (+25.0% against +4.8%).
Read the full Redis review and pricing or the Silk review and pricing. You can also browse other Redis alternatives we track.