Redis vs ScyllaDB
Redis vs ScyllaDB, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Redis is on 75/100 and ScyllaDB on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Redis
- our overall score: 75/100 against 67/100
- agent readiness: 72/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 73/100
- headcount: 1,515 against 225
- funding raised: $907M against $101M
- LinkedIn following: 293,456 against 28,743
ScyllaDB
- headcount growth: +13.6% against +4.8%
At a glance
| Measure | Redis | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Redis is an open-source, in-memory data platform used as a database, cache, and message broker, powering real-time applications at scale. | ScyllaDB is a high-performance, low-latency NoSQL database for data-intensive applications, designed to scale with modern infrastructure. |
| Category | Database, In-Memory Database, Cache, Message Broker | Database, Enterprise, NoSQL, NoSQL Database |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Redis | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,515 | 225 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.8% | +13.6% |
| Total funding | $907M | $101M |
| Latest round | Series F | Debt |
| Valuation | $2.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 293,456 | 28,743 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Redis | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 75/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 87/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | B (72/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Redis | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Redis | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads |
“My custom RDBMS is 588,235x faster than ScyllaDB on my laptop with fsync on executing a complex HTAP query.”r/Database
Redis vs ScyllaDB: common questions
Which is better, Redis or ScyllaDB?
On our 0-100 score Redis rates higher (75/100 against 67/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Redis and ScyllaDB compare on the numbers?
Redis leads on our overall score (75/100 against 67/100), agent readiness (72/100 against 46/100), domain rating (90/100 against 73/100), headcount (1,515 against 225), funding raised ($907M against $101M), LinkedIn following (293,456 against 28,743). ScyllaDB leads on headcount growth (+13.6% against +4.8%).
What do real users say about Redis and ScyllaDB?
ScyllaDB: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Database.
Read the full Redis review and pricing or the ScyllaDB review and pricing. You can also browse other Redis alternatives we track.