Recorded Future vs ThreatConnect
Recorded Future vs ThreatConnect, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Recorded Future is on 55/100 and ThreatConnect on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Recorded Future
- our overall score: 55/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 42/100
- funding raised: $114M against $60.0M
ThreatConnect
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Recorded Future | ThreatConnect |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Real-time threat intelligence for security and risk management. | Threat intelligence platform for security operations, enabling proactive threat defense and risk reduction. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Intelligence, Data Analytics | Cybersecurity, Threat Intelligence, Security Operations, Risk Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Somerville, United States | Arlington, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Recorded Future | ThreatConnect |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 89 |
| Total funding | $114M | $60.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 28,477 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Recorded Future | ThreatConnect |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 9/100 | 26/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 40/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Recorded Future | ThreatConnect |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Recorded Future vs ThreatConnect: common questions
Which is better, Recorded Future or ThreatConnect?
On our 0-100 score Recorded Future rates higher (55/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Recorded Future and ThreatConnect compare on the numbers?
Recorded Future leads on our overall score (55/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 42/100), funding raised ($114M against $60.0M).
Read the full Recorded Future review and pricing or the ThreatConnect review and pricing. You can also browse other Recorded Future alternatives we track.