Reap vs Spendesk
Reap vs Spendesk, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Reap is on 57/100 and Spendesk on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Reap
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Spendesk
- our overall score: 63/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 332 against 264
- funding raised: $71.0M against $45.0M
- LinkedIn following: 55,185 against 36,811
At a glance
| Measure | Reap | Spendesk |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A corporate payment solutions platform for businesses to manage and optimize their spending. | All-in-one spend management platform for growing businesses. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Corporate Cards, Expense Management | Fintech, Payments, Expense Management, Corporate Cards |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Hong Kong, Hong Kong | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Reap | Spendesk |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 264 | 332 |
| Total funding | $45.0M | $71.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 36,811 | 55,185 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Reap | Spendesk |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 57/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | Not published |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 55/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Reap | Spendesk |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Netlify |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Nuxt |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel | Amplitude |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
Reap vs Spendesk: common questions
Which is better, Reap or Spendesk?
On our 0-100 score Spendesk rates higher (63/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Reap and Spendesk compare on the numbers?
Spendesk leads on our overall score (63/100 against 57/100), domain rating (74/100 against 55/100), headcount (332 against 264), funding raised ($71.0M against $45.0M), LinkedIn following (55,185 against 36,811).
Read the full Reap review and pricing or the Spendesk review and pricing. You can also browse other Reap alternatives we track.