Re Sustainability vs WM (Waste Management)
Re Sustainability vs WM (Waste Management), compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Re Sustainability is on 47/100 and WM (Waste Management) on 38/100.
Where each one leads
Re Sustainability
- our overall score: 47/100 against 38/100
WM (Waste Management)
- domain rating: 80/100 against 35/100
- headcount: 27,963 against 2,698
- LinkedIn following: 350,632 against 68,364
At a glance
| Measure | Re Sustainability | WM (Waste Management) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A platform focused on enabling businesses to achieve and report on sustainability goals. | North America's leading provider of comprehensive waste management and environmental solutions. |
| Category | Sustainability, Climate Tech, ESG Reporting, Enterprise Software | Waste Management, Environmental Services, Recycling, Renewable Energy |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B | B2C | B2G |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2021 | 1968 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Houston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Re Sustainability | WM (Waste Management) |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,698 | 27,963 |
| Total funding | $1.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 68,364 | 350,632 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Re Sustainability | WM (Waste Management) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 38/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 35/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Re Sustainability | WM (Waste Management) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Re Sustainability vs WM (Waste Management): common questions
Which is better, Re Sustainability or WM (Waste Management)?
On our 0-100 score Re Sustainability rates higher (47/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Re Sustainability and WM (Waste Management) compare on the numbers?
Re Sustainability leads on our overall score (47/100 against 38/100). WM (Waste Management) leads on domain rating (80/100 against 35/100), headcount (27,963 against 2,698), LinkedIn following (350,632 against 68,364).
Read the full Re Sustainability review and pricing or the WM (Waste Management) review and pricing. You can also browse other Re Sustainability alternatives we track.