Raftt vs Port
Raftt vs Port, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Raftt is on 51/100 and Port on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Raftt
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Port
- our overall score: 64/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 511 against 6
- headcount growth: +144.8% against -28.1%
- funding raised: $62.0M against $5.0M
- LinkedIn following: 22,660 against 459
At a glance
| Measure | Raftt | Port |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud-based development environments that syncs changes and mirrors remote services. | Developer portal and experience platform for modern engineering teams. |
| Category | Enterprise, Development, DevTools, Developer Tools | Enterprise, DevOps, Development, Developer Tools |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Raftt | Port |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 6 | 511 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -28.1% | +144.8% |
| Total funding | $5.0M | $62.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 459 | 22,660 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Raftt | Port |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 42/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 31/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Raftt | Port |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Fastly | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Segment, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | Not detected | Intercom, HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Raftt vs Port: common questions
Which is better, Raftt or Port?
On our 0-100 score Port rates higher (64/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Raftt and Port compare on the numbers?
Port leads on our overall score (64/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 30/100), domain rating (70/100 against 31/100), headcount (511 against 6), headcount growth (+144.8% against -28.1%), funding raised ($62.0M against $5.0M), LinkedIn following (22,660 against 459).
Read the full Raftt review and pricing or the Port review and pricing. You can also browse other Raftt alternatives we track.