RAD Security vs RedAccess
RAD Security vs RedAccess, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: RAD Security is on 60/100 and RedAccess on 46/100.
Where each one leads
RAD Security
- our overall score: 60/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 48/100 against 38/100
- funding raised: $29.0M against $1.5M
- LinkedIn following: 6,807 against 2,863
RedAccess
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | RAD Security | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-driven platform for securing AI workloads and cloud infrastructure with real-time, behavior-driven defense. | Cybersecurity firm specializing in discovering publicly accessible assets and shadow AI risks. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Cloud Security, Threat Detection, AI Infrastructure | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Cloud Security, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | RAD Security | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 38 | 46 |
| Total funding | $29.0M | $1.5M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,807 | 2,863 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | RAD Security | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 66/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (34/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 48/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | RAD Security | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Flyio | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes, 317 GitHub stars | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | RAD Security | RedAccess |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | AI-Powered Security, Automated Investigation & Response, Cost-Effective Security & AI Governance, Real-Time Threat Prioritization, RADBots, GRC Automation | Not published |
RAD Security vs RedAccess: common questions
Which is better, RAD Security or RedAccess?
On our 0-100 score RAD Security rates higher (60/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do RAD Security and RedAccess compare on the numbers?
RAD Security leads on our overall score (60/100 against 46/100), domain rating (48/100 against 38/100), funding raised ($29.0M against $1.5M), LinkedIn following (6,807 against 2,863).
Read the full RAD Security review and pricing or the RedAccess review and pricing. You can also browse other RAD Security alternatives we track.