Quixey vs safeDK
Quixey vs safeDK, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Quixey is on 47/100 and safeDK on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Quixey
- funding raised: $164M against $5.8M
safeDK
- our overall score: 56/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 39/100
- headcount: 1,539 against 29
- LinkedIn following: 147,101 against 9,591
At a glance
| Measure | Quixey | safeDK |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Quixey pioneered deep mobile search, connecting users to instant actions within apps for quick task completion. | Acquired safeDK, a platform for managing and optimizing mobile SDKs for app publishers. |
| Category | Search, Mobile, App, Mobile Search | Mobile, App, Software Development, Mobile App Analytics |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Quixey | safeDK |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 29 | 1,539 |
| Total funding | $164M | $5.8M |
| Latest round | Debt | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,591 | 147,101 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Quixey | safeDK |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 39/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Quixey | safeDK |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Quixey | safeDK |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 1 negative across 2 threads | 2 positive, 2 negative across 4 threads |
“[DEV] Quixey: app search that finds apps by what they do.”r/androidapps
“AppLovin acquires SafeDK to improve brand safety.”r/techcrunch
Quixey vs safeDK: common questions
Which is better, Quixey or safeDK?
On our 0-100 score safeDK rates higher (56/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Quixey and safeDK compare on the numbers?
Quixey leads on funding raised ($164M against $5.8M). safeDK leads on our overall score (56/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 22/100), domain rating (90/100 against 39/100), headcount (1,539 against 29), LinkedIn following (147,101 against 9,591).
What do real users say about Quixey and safeDK?
Quixey: 1 positive and 1 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/androidapps. safeDK: 2 positive and 2 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/techcrunch.
Read the full Quixey review and pricing or the safeDK review and pricing. You can also browse other Quixey alternatives we track.