QuintoAndar vs Zefir
QuintoAndar vs Zefir, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: QuintoAndar is on 59/100 and Zefir on 27/100.
Where each one leads
QuintoAndar
- our overall score: 59/100 against 27/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 40/100
- funding raised: $744M against $27.2M
Zefir
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | QuintoAndar | Zefir |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Brazilian proptech platform simplifying real estate rentals and sales through technology. | AI-powered real estate marketplace simplifying property transactions for buyers and sellers. |
| Category | Proptech, Real Estate Technology, Marketplace, Fintech | Proptech, Real Estate, AI, Marketplace |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | São Paulo, Brazil | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | QuintoAndar | Zefir |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 124 |
| Open roles | Not published | 10 |
| Total funding | $744M | $27.2M |
| Latest round | Series E (Extension) | Series B |
| Valuation | $5.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 7,930 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | QuintoAndar | Zefir |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 27/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 6/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 15/100 | 3/100 |
| Quality | 70/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 40/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | QuintoAndar | Zefir |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Google Cloud |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Tag Manager |
QuintoAndar vs Zefir: common questions
Which is better, QuintoAndar or Zefir?
On our 0-100 score QuintoAndar rates higher (59/100 against 27/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do QuintoAndar and Zefir compare on the numbers?
QuintoAndar leads on our overall score (59/100 against 27/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 31/100), domain rating (76/100 against 40/100), funding raised ($744M against $27.2M).
Read the full QuintoAndar review and pricing or the Zefir review and pricing. You can also browse other QuintoAndar alternatives we track.