QuintoAndar vs Smart City Locating
QuintoAndar vs Smart City Locating, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: QuintoAndar is on 59/100 and Smart City Locating on 22/100.
Where each one leads
QuintoAndar
- our overall score: 59/100 against 22/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 33/100
Smart City Locating
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | QuintoAndar | Smart City Locating |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Brazilian proptech platform simplifying real estate rentals and sales through technology. | Industry leader in property locating services, filling vacancies for property managers. |
| Category | Proptech, Real Estate Technology, Marketplace, Fintech | Real Estate, Proptech, Marketplace, Consumer Services |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2013 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | São Paulo, Brazil | Austin, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | QuintoAndar | Smart City Locating |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 5 |
| Total funding | $744M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series E (Extension) | Not published |
| Valuation | $5.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 7 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | QuintoAndar | Smart City Locating |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 22/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 8/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 1/100 |
| Search visibility | 15/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 70/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 33/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | QuintoAndar | Smart City Locating |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Tiktok Pixel |
QuintoAndar vs Smart City Locating: common questions
Which is better, QuintoAndar or Smart City Locating?
On our 0-100 score QuintoAndar rates higher (59/100 against 22/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do QuintoAndar and Smart City Locating compare on the numbers?
QuintoAndar leads on our overall score (59/100 against 22/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 39/100), domain rating (76/100 against 33/100).
Read the full QuintoAndar review and pricing or the Smart City Locating review and pricing. You can also browse other QuintoAndar alternatives we track.