Quilr vs Trent AI
Quilr vs Trent AI, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Quilr is on 51/100 and Trent AI on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Quilr
- headcount: 70 against 14
- LinkedIn following: 6,661 against 1,024
Trent AI
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 52/100
- funding raised: $13.0M against $4.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Quilr | Trent AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Quilr uses AI agents and a Service-as-Software platform to prevent human-related security breaches. | Securing AI agents and autonomous workflows. |
| Category | Agentic AI, Cybersecurity, AI Agent, Threat Detection | Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity, Agentic AI, AI Agents |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Quilr | Trent AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 70 | 14 |
| Total funding | $4.0M | $13.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,661 | 1,024 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Quilr | Trent AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (59/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 31/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Quilr | Trent AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Quilr | Trent AI |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Safe AI Adoption, Frictionless Data Sharing, SaaS Identity Protection, Behavioral Risk Management, Self-Resolution of Alerts | Not published |
Quilr vs Trent AI: common questions
Which is better, Quilr or Trent AI?
On our 0-100 score Trent AI rates higher (53/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Quilr and Trent AI compare on the numbers?
Quilr leads on headcount (70 against 14), LinkedIn following (6,661 against 1,024). Trent AI leads on agent readiness (59/100 against 52/100), funding raised ($13.0M against $4.0M).
Read the full Quilr review and pricing or the Trent AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Quilr alternatives we track.