Quilr vs RiskHorizon AI
Quilr vs RiskHorizon AI, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Quilr is on 51/100 and RiskHorizon AI on 45/100.
Where each one leads
Quilr
- our overall score: 51/100 against 45/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 34/100
- domain rating: 31/100 against 10/100
- headcount: 70 against 4
- LinkedIn following: 6,661 against 785
RiskHorizon AI
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Quilr | RiskHorizon AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Quilr uses AI agents and a Service-as-Software platform to prevent human-related security breaches. | Agentic threat exposure engine to identify, prioritize, and fix critical security risks. |
| Category | Agentic AI, Cybersecurity, AI Agent, Threat Detection | Agentic AI, Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, AI Agent |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Quilr | RiskHorizon AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 70 | 4 |
| Total funding | $4.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,661 | 785 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Quilr | RiskHorizon AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 45/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 7/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | F (34/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 31/100 | 10/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Quilr | RiskHorizon AI |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Quilr | RiskHorizon AI |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Safe AI Adoption, Frictionless Data Sharing, SaaS Identity Protection, Behavioral Risk Management, Self-Resolution of Alerts | Triage Dashboard, Investigation Queue, Asset Management, RiskTrends, Centralize and Enrich, Prioritize and Orchestrate |
Quilr vs RiskHorizon AI: common questions
Which is better, Quilr or RiskHorizon AI?
On our 0-100 score Quilr rates higher (51/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Quilr and RiskHorizon AI compare on the numbers?
Quilr leads on our overall score (51/100 against 45/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 34/100), domain rating (31/100 against 10/100), headcount (70 against 4), LinkedIn following (6,661 against 785).
Read the full Quilr review and pricing or the RiskHorizon AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Quilr alternatives we track.