QuickNode vs Substrate
QuickNode vs Substrate, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: QuickNode is on 62/100 and Substrate on 34/100.
Where each one leads
QuickNode
- our overall score: 62/100 against 34/100
- agent readiness: 77/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 66/100
Substrate
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | QuickNode | Substrate |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Blockchain infrastructure provider offering high-performance RPC nodes and developer tools for Web3 applications. | A blockchain framework for building custom, upgradeable, and interoperable decentralized applications. |
| Category | Blockchain, Web3, SaaS, Infrastructure | Blockchain, Decentralized Applications, Web3, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Miami, United States | Berlin, Germany |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | QuickNode | Substrate |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 122 | Not published |
| Total funding | $95.0M | $108M |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| Valuation | $800M | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | QuickNode | Substrate |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 34/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 10/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 13/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 40/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | B (77/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 66/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | QuickNode | Substrate |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Fastly |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Payments | Stripe | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Segment | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot, Discourse | Not detected |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | X402 | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
QuickNode vs Substrate: common questions
Which is better, QuickNode or Substrate?
On our 0-100 score QuickNode rates higher (62/100 against 34/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do QuickNode and Substrate compare on the numbers?
QuickNode leads on our overall score (62/100 against 34/100), agent readiness (77/100 against 22/100), domain rating (76/100 against 66/100).
Read the full QuickNode review and pricing or the Substrate review and pricing. You can also browse other QuickNode alternatives we track.