Quickmining vs StarkWare
Quickmining vs StarkWare, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Quickmining is on 6/100 and StarkWare on 73/100.
Where each one leads
Quickmining
- agent readiness: 39/100 against 30/100
StarkWare
- our overall score: 73/100 against 6/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 0/100
At a glance
| Measure | Quickmining | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Khám phá hệ sinh thái giải trí đa dạng tại nhà cái TX88. Trải nghiệm cá cược thể thao, sòng bài trực tuyến người thật với hệ thống nạp rút tự động 24/7. | Develops blockchain scaling solutions using STARK technology for Ethereum-secure, fast, and seamless user experiences. |
| Category | AI Infrastructure, Fintech, Cryptocurrency, Mining Analytics | Blockchain, NFT, Crypto, Cryptocurrency |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Quickmining | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 194 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +15.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $180M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $8.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 20,607 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Quickmining | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 6/100 | 73/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Quickmining | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Not detected | Walletconnect |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Quickmining vs StarkWare: common questions
Which is better, Quickmining or StarkWare?
On our 0-100 score StarkWare rates higher (73/100 against 6/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Quickmining and StarkWare compare on the numbers?
Quickmining leads on agent readiness (39/100 against 30/100). StarkWare leads on our overall score (73/100 against 6/100), domain rating (71/100 against 0/100).
Read the full Quickmining review and pricing or the StarkWare review and pricing. You can also browse other Quickmining alternatives we track.