Quickbase vs Zapier
Quickbase vs Zapier, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Quickbase is on 69/100 and Zapier on 77/100.
Where each one leads
Quickbase
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Zapier
- our overall score: 77/100 against 69/100
- agent readiness: 71/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 80/100
- headcount: 1,447 against 814
- headcount growth: +17.9% against -24.4%
- funding raised: $1.3B against $1.0B
- LinkedIn following: 360,432 against 27,996
At a glance
| Measure | Quickbase | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Low-code application platform for work management, centralizing complex projects and processes. | Zapier automates workflows by connecting web applications, enabling users to move data and automate tasks without coding. |
| Category | Work Management, Low-Code Development, Application Platform, Business Process Management | Workflow Automation, Application Integration, Low-Code Development, No-Code Development |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1999 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Waltham, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Quickbase | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 814 | 1,447 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -24.4% | +17.9% |
| Total funding | $1.0B | $1.3B |
| Latest round | Acquisition | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $5.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,996 | 360,432 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Quickbase | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 77/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 66/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 87/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | B (71/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Quickbase | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Quickbase vs Zapier: common questions
Which is better, Quickbase or Zapier?
On our 0-100 score Zapier rates higher (77/100 against 69/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Quickbase and Zapier compare on the numbers?
Zapier leads on our overall score (77/100 against 69/100), agent readiness (71/100 against 42/100), domain rating (91/100 against 80/100), headcount (1,447 against 814), headcount growth (+17.9% against -24.4%), funding raised ($1.3B against $1.0B), LinkedIn following (360,432 against 27,996).
Read the full Quickbase review and pricing or the Zapier review and pricing. You can also browse other Quickbase alternatives we track.