Quickbase vs Tonkean
Quickbase vs Tonkean, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Quickbase is on 69/100 and Tonkean on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Quickbase
- our overall score: 69/100 against 62/100
- domain rating: 80/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 814 against 80
- funding raised: $1.0B against $83.2M
- LinkedIn following: 27,996 against 10,015
Tonkean
- headcount growth: -0.4% against -24.4%
At a glance
| Measure | Quickbase | Tonkean |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Low-code application platform for work management, centralizing complex projects and processes. | AI-powered platform for enterprise intake and process orchestration, automating workflows for procurement, legal, and IT. |
| Category | Work Management, Low-Code Development, Application Platform, Business Process Management | Enterprise Software, Workflow Automation, Process Automation, Business Process Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1999 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Waltham, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Quickbase | Tonkean |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 814 | 80 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -24.4% | -0.4% |
| Total funding | $1.0B | $83.2M |
| Latest round | Acquisition | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 27,996 | 10,015 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Quickbase | Tonkean |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 63/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Quickbase | Tonkean |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Quickbase vs Tonkean: common questions
Which is better, Quickbase or Tonkean?
On our 0-100 score Quickbase rates higher (69/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Quickbase and Tonkean compare on the numbers?
Quickbase leads on our overall score (69/100 against 62/100), domain rating (80/100 against 63/100), headcount (814 against 80), funding raised ($1.0B against $83.2M), LinkedIn following (27,996 against 10,015). Tonkean leads on headcount growth (-0.4% against -24.4%).
Read the full Quickbase review and pricing or the Tonkean review and pricing. You can also browse other Quickbase alternatives we track.