QueenDee vs SupPlant
QueenDee vs SupPlant, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: QueenDee is on 11/100 and SupPlant on 66/100.
Where each one leads
QueenDee
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
SupPlant
- our overall score: 66/100 against 11/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 31/100
At a glance
| Measure | QueenDee | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automated collection and dispersion of pollen for greenhouse pollination. | Agritech company providing AI-driven irrigation solutions for water-stressed agriculture, optimizing crop yields and conserving water. |
| Category | AgTech, Robotics, Precision Agriculture, Greenhouse Technology | AgTech, Precision Agriculture, Water Management, Crop Optimization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Israel, Israel | Afula, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | QueenDee | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 55 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -13.4% |
| Total funding | Not published | $62.9M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $30.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 15,340 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | QueenDee | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 11/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 56/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 17/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | QueenDee | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
QueenDee vs SupPlant: common questions
Which is better, QueenDee or SupPlant?
On our 0-100 score SupPlant rates higher (66/100 against 11/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do QueenDee and SupPlant compare on the numbers?
SupPlant leads on our overall score (66/100 against 11/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 31/100).
Read the full QueenDee review and pricing or the SupPlant review and pricing. You can also browse other QueenDee alternatives we track.