Qsee vs Urecsys
Qsee vs Urecsys, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Qsee is on 39/100 and Urecsys on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Qsee
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 13/100 against 8/100
Urecsys
- our overall score: 53/100 against 39/100
- headcount: 27 against 7
- headcount growth: +11.5% against -4.0%
- funding raised: $14.0M against $400K
- LinkedIn following: 1,751 against 349
At a glance
| Measure | Qsee | Urecsys |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered quality predictive analytics for process manufacturers to optimize productivity and reduce waste. | Urecsys optimizes indoor air quality by using AI and machine learning to adjust outdoor airflow based on real-time pollution levels. |
| Category | Industry 4.0, Predictive Analytics, Quality Control, Predictive Maintenance | Smart Building, Air Quality, Indoor, Outdoor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Seoul, South Korea |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Qsee | Urecsys |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 7 | 27 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -4.0% | +11.5% |
| Total funding | $400K | $14.0M |
| Latest round | Pre-Seed | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $50.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 349 | 1,751 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Qsee | Urecsys |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | Not published | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 13/100 | 8/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Qsee | Urecsys |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Framer | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4 |
Qsee vs Urecsys: common questions
Which is better, Qsee or Urecsys?
On our 0-100 score Urecsys rates higher (53/100 against 39/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Qsee and Urecsys compare on the numbers?
Qsee leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 21/100), domain rating (13/100 against 8/100). Urecsys leads on our overall score (53/100 against 39/100), headcount (27 against 7), headcount growth (+11.5% against -4.0%), funding raised ($14.0M against $400K), LinkedIn following (1,751 against 349).
Read the full Qsee review and pricing or the Urecsys review and pricing. You can also browse other Qsee alternatives we track.