Qryptic Tech vs StarkWare
Qryptic Tech vs StarkWare, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Qryptic Tech is on 7/100 and StarkWare on 73/100.
Where each one leads
Qryptic Tech
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
StarkWare
- our overall score: 73/100 against 7/100
At a glance
| Measure | Qryptic Tech | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Hybrid classical and lattice signatures for secure, in-place retrofitting of wallets, contracts, and bridges across chains. | Develops blockchain scaling solutions using STARK technology for Ethereum-secure, fast, and seamless user experiences. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Post-Quantum Cryptography, Blockchain, Fintech | Blockchain, NFT, Crypto, Cryptocurrency |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Qryptic Tech | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 194 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +15.6% |
| Total funding | Not published | $180M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $8.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 20,607 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Qryptic Tech | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 7/100 | 73/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 38/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Qryptic Tech | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Lovable | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Not detected | Walletconnect |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Qryptic Tech vs StarkWare: common questions
Which is better, Qryptic Tech or StarkWare?
On our 0-100 score StarkWare rates higher (73/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Qryptic Tech and StarkWare compare on the numbers?
StarkWare leads on our overall score (73/100 against 7/100).
Read the full Qryptic Tech review and pricing or the StarkWare review and pricing. You can also browse other Qryptic Tech alternatives we track.