Qrypt vs Reco
Qrypt vs Reco, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Qrypt is on 55/100 and Reco on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Qrypt
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Reco
- our overall score: 65/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 44/100
- funding raised: $123M against $50.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Qrypt | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Quantum-powered cybersecurity solutions providing unbreakable encryption and quantum entropy for data protection. | Identity-first SaaS security platform for discovering and controlling SaaS applications, identities, and data. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Quantum Technology, Data Security, SaaS | Cybersecurity, SaaS Security, Cloud Security, Identity & Access Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Qrypt | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 185 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +88.4% |
| Total funding | $50.0M | $123M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 17,359 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Qrypt | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 56/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 44/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Qrypt | Reco |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Qrypt vs Reco: common questions
Which is better, Qrypt or Reco?
On our 0-100 score Reco rates higher (65/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Qrypt and Reco compare on the numbers?
Reco leads on our overall score (65/100 against 55/100), domain rating (68/100 against 44/100), funding raised ($123M against $50.0M).
Read the full Qrypt review and pricing or the Reco review and pricing. You can also browse other Qrypt alternatives we track.