Queen Mary University of London Spinouts vs Thermo Fisher Scientific
Queen Mary University of London Spinouts vs Thermo Fisher Scientific, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Queen Mary University of London Spinouts is on 7/100 and Thermo Fisher Scientific on 78/100.
Where each one leads
Queen Mary University of London Spinouts
- agent readiness: 25/100 against 22/100
Thermo Fisher Scientific
- our overall score: 78/100 against 7/100
At a glance
| Measure | Queen Mary University of London Spinouts | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A collective of grant-stage to Series A companies spun out from Queen Mary University of London, actively seeking investment in sectors like life sciences, AI, and sustainability. | Global leader in serving science, providing analytical instruments, consumables, and services for research, diagnostics, and manufacturing. |
| Category | Life Sciences, Sustainability, University Spinout, Technology Transfer | Life Sciences, Analytical Instruments, Laboratory Equipment, Biotechnology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 1956 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Waltham, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Queen Mary University of London Spinouts | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 100,104 |
| Total funding | Not published | $5.5B |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Debt |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $220B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 2,298,918 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Queen Mary University of London Spinouts | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 7/100 | 78/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 99/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 84/100 | 86/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Queen Mary University of London Spinouts | Thermo Fisher Scientific |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight | Not detected |
Queen Mary University of London Spinouts vs Thermo Fisher Scientific: common questions
Which is better, Queen Mary University of London Spinouts or Thermo Fisher Scientific?
On our 0-100 score Thermo Fisher Scientific rates higher (78/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Queen Mary University of London Spinouts and Thermo Fisher Scientific compare on the numbers?
Queen Mary University of London Spinouts leads on agent readiness (25/100 against 22/100). Thermo Fisher Scientific leads on our overall score (78/100 against 7/100).
Read the full Queen Mary University of London Spinouts review and pricing or the Thermo Fisher Scientific review and pricing. You can also browse other Queen Mary University of London Spinouts alternatives we track.