Quantum Machines vs Rigetti Computing
Quantum Machines vs Rigetti Computing, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Quantum Machines is on 68/100 and Rigetti Computing on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Quantum Machines
- our overall score: 68/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 302 against 186
- funding raised: $293M against $178M
Rigetti Computing
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 54/100
- LinkedIn following: 49,076 against 31,433
At a glance
| Measure | Quantum Machines | Rigetti Computing |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Builds the Quantum Orchestration Platform (QOP) to accelerate quantum computing development and deployment. | Designs, manufactures, and deploys superconducting quantum computers and processors. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Quantum Hardware, Quantum Software, AI Hardware | Quantum Computing, AI Hardware, Semiconductor, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware, software, platform, services |
| Founded | 2018 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Berkeley, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Quantum Machines | Rigetti Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 302 | 186 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +27.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $293M | $178M |
| Latest round | Not published | Grant |
| Valuation | $700M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 31,433 | 49,076 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Quantum Machines | Rigetti Computing |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 54/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Quantum Machines | Rigetti Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
Quantum Machines vs Rigetti Computing: common questions
Which is better, Quantum Machines or Rigetti Computing?
On our 0-100 score Quantum Machines rates higher (68/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Quantum Machines and Rigetti Computing compare on the numbers?
Quantum Machines leads on our overall score (68/100 against 59/100), headcount (302 against 186), funding raised ($293M against $178M). Rigetti Computing leads on agent readiness (41/100 against 25/100), domain rating (71/100 against 54/100), LinkedIn following (49,076 against 31,433).
Read the full Quantum Machines review and pricing or the Rigetti Computing review and pricing. You can also browse other Quantum Machines alternatives we track.