Qihan Technology vs Uma
Qihan Technology vs Uma, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Qihan Technology is on 7/100 and Uma on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Qihan Technology
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Uma
- our overall score: 58/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 36/100 against 19/100
At a glance
| Measure | Qihan Technology | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Qihan Technology offers wheeled humanoid robots like the Sanbot series for tasks in education, security, retail, and healthcare. | Developing advanced physical AI and humanoid robots for industrial and domestic environments, focusing on real-world performance and learning through demonstration. |
| Category | Robotics, Humanoid Robotics, Computer Vision, AI Hardware | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2014 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Shenzhen, China | Paris, France |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Qihan Technology | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 29 |
| Total funding | Not published | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 5,831 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Qihan Technology | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 7/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 53/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 8/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 19/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Qihan Technology | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Qihan Technology vs Uma: common questions
Which is better, Qihan Technology or Uma?
On our 0-100 score Uma rates higher (58/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Qihan Technology and Uma compare on the numbers?
Uma leads on our overall score (58/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 22/100), domain rating (36/100 against 19/100).
Read the full Qihan Technology review and pricing or the Uma review and pricing. You can also browse other Qihan Technology alternatives we track.