QEDMA vs Riverlane
QEDMA vs Riverlane, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: QEDMA is on 56/100 and Riverlane on 49/100.
Where each one leads
QEDMA
- our overall score: 56/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 35/100
- headcount: 40 against 14
- LinkedIn following: 5,017 against 62
Riverlane
- domain rating: 59/100 against 52/100
- funding raised: $93.9M against $40.7M
At a glance
| Measure | QEDMA | Riverlane |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Israeli startup developing quantum noise resilience software to improve quantum computing. | Riverlane develops quantum error correction technology to make quantum computers useful sooner. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Quantum Error Correction, Quantum Software, Operating System | Quantum Computing, Quantum Error Correction, Quantum Software, Quantum Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | hardware | platform |
| Founded | 2020 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Cambridge, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | QEDMA | Riverlane |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 40 | 14 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +31.2% | Not published |
| Open roles | 4 | Not published |
| Total funding | $40.7M | $93.9M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $400M |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,017 | 62 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | QEDMA | Riverlane |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 40/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 26/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 52/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | QEDMA | Riverlane |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
QEDMA vs Riverlane: common questions
Which is better, QEDMA or Riverlane?
On our 0-100 score QEDMA rates higher (56/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do QEDMA and Riverlane compare on the numbers?
QEDMA leads on our overall score (56/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 35/100), headcount (40 against 14), LinkedIn following (5,017 against 62). Riverlane leads on domain rating (59/100 against 52/100), funding raised ($93.9M against $40.7M).
Read the full QEDMA review and pricing or the Riverlane review and pricing. You can also browse other QEDMA alternatives we track.