QEDMA vs Rigetti Computing
QEDMA vs Rigetti Computing, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: QEDMA is on 56/100 and Rigetti Computing on 59/100.
Where each one leads
QEDMA
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Rigetti Computing
- our overall score: 59/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 186 against 40
- funding raised: $178M against $40.7M
- LinkedIn following: 49,076 against 5,017
At a glance
| Measure | QEDMA | Rigetti Computing |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Israeli startup developing quantum noise resilience software to improve quantum computing. | Designs, manufactures, and deploys superconducting quantum computers and processors. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Quantum Error Correction, Quantum Software, Operating System | Quantum Computing, AI Hardware, Semiconductor, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware, software, platform, services |
| Founded | 2020 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Berkeley, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | QEDMA | Rigetti Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 40 | 186 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +31.2% | Not published |
| Open roles | 4 | Not published |
| Total funding | $40.7M | $178M |
| Latest round | Series A | Grant |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,017 | 49,076 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | QEDMA | Rigetti Computing |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 52/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | QEDMA | Rigetti Computing |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
QEDMA vs Rigetti Computing: common questions
Which is better, QEDMA or Rigetti Computing?
On our 0-100 score Rigetti Computing rates higher (59/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do QEDMA and Rigetti Computing compare on the numbers?
Rigetti Computing leads on our overall score (59/100 against 56/100), domain rating (71/100 against 52/100), headcount (186 against 40), funding raised ($178M against $40.7M), LinkedIn following (49,076 against 5,017).
Read the full QEDMA review and pricing or the Rigetti Computing review and pricing. You can also browse other QEDMA alternatives we track.