QEDMA vs Quantum Brilliance
QEDMA vs Quantum Brilliance, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: QEDMA is on 56/100 and Quantum Brilliance on 52/100.
Where each one leads
QEDMA
- our overall score: 56/100 against 52/100
- funding raised: $40.7M against $23.0M
Quantum Brilliance
- headcount: 111 against 40
- LinkedIn following: 15,083 against 5,017
At a glance
| Measure | QEDMA | Quantum Brilliance |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Israeli startup developing quantum noise resilience software to improve quantum computing. | Develops advanced quantum computing solutions for enterprise and government applications. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Quantum Error Correction, Quantum Software, Operating System | Quantum Computing, AI Hardware, Semiconductor, Chip Design |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2020 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Canberra, Australia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | QEDMA | Quantum Brilliance |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 40 | 111 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +31.2% | Not published |
| Open roles | 4 | Not published |
| Total funding | $40.7M | $23.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,017 | 15,083 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | QEDMA | Quantum Brilliance |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 40/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 52/100 | 51/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | QEDMA | Quantum Brilliance |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
QEDMA vs Quantum Brilliance: common questions
Which is better, QEDMA or Quantum Brilliance?
On our 0-100 score QEDMA rates higher (56/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do QEDMA and Quantum Brilliance compare on the numbers?
QEDMA leads on our overall score (56/100 against 52/100), funding raised ($40.7M against $23.0M). Quantum Brilliance leads on headcount (111 against 40), LinkedIn following (15,083 against 5,017).
Read the full QEDMA review and pricing or the Quantum Brilliance review and pricing. You can also browse other QEDMA alternatives we track.