QEDMA vs Quantinuum
QEDMA vs Quantinuum, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: QEDMA is on 56/100 and Quantinuum on 66/100.
Where each one leads
QEDMA
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 36/100
Quantinuum
- our overall score: 66/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 663 against 40
- funding raised: $1.2B against $40.7M
- LinkedIn following: 62,825 against 5,017
At a glance
| Measure | QEDMA | Quantinuum |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Israeli startup developing quantum noise resilience software to improve quantum computing. | Quantum computing company focused on building fault-tolerant quantum computers and quantum software. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Quantum Error Correction, Quantum Software, Operating System | Quantum Computing, AI Chip, AI Hardware, Quantum Error Correction |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware | software | platform |
| Founded | 2020 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Broomfield, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | QEDMA | Quantinuum |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 40 | 663 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +31.2% | Not published |
| Open roles | 4 | Not published |
| Total funding | $40.7M | $1.2B |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| Valuation | Not published | $10K |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,017 | 62,825 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | QEDMA | Quantinuum |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 52/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | QEDMA | Quantinuum |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
QEDMA vs Quantinuum: common questions
Which is better, QEDMA or Quantinuum?
On our 0-100 score Quantinuum rates higher (66/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do QEDMA and Quantinuum compare on the numbers?
QEDMA leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 36/100). Quantinuum leads on our overall score (66/100 against 56/100), domain rating (72/100 against 52/100), headcount (663 against 40), funding raised ($1.2B against $40.7M), LinkedIn following (62,825 against 5,017).
Read the full QEDMA review and pricing or the Quantinuum review and pricing. You can also browse other QEDMA alternatives we track.