QEDMA vs Quantum Machines
QEDMA vs Quantum Machines, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: QEDMA is on 56/100 and Quantum Machines on 68/100.
Where each one leads
QEDMA
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 25/100
Quantum Machines
- our overall score: 68/100 against 56/100
- headcount: 302 against 40
- funding raised: $293M against $40.7M
- LinkedIn following: 31,433 against 5,017
At a glance
| Measure | QEDMA | Quantum Machines |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Israeli startup developing quantum noise resilience software to improve quantum computing. | Builds the Quantum Orchestration Platform (QOP) to accelerate quantum computing development and deployment. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Quantum Error Correction, Quantum Software, Operating System | Quantum Computing, Quantum Hardware, Quantum Software, AI Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | QEDMA | Quantum Machines |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 40 | 302 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +31.2% | +27.4% |
| Open roles | 4 | Not published |
| Total funding | $40.7M | $293M |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| Valuation | Not published | $700M |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,017 | 31,433 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | QEDMA | Quantum Machines |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 52/100 | 54/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | QEDMA | Quantum Machines |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
QEDMA vs Quantum Machines: common questions
Which is better, QEDMA or Quantum Machines?
On our 0-100 score Quantum Machines rates higher (68/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do QEDMA and Quantum Machines compare on the numbers?
QEDMA leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 25/100). Quantum Machines leads on our overall score (68/100 against 56/100), headcount (302 against 40), funding raised ($293M against $40.7M), LinkedIn following (31,433 against 5,017).
Read the full QEDMA review and pricing or the Quantum Machines review and pricing. You can also browse other QEDMA alternatives we track.