QED-it vs StarkWare
QED-it vs StarkWare, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: QED-it is on 47/100 and StarkWare on 73/100.
Where each one leads
QED-it
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 30/100
StarkWare
- our overall score: 73/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 194 against 11
- funding raised: $180M against $13.0M
At a glance
| Measure | QED-it | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise privacy platform using zero-knowledge proofs to enable secure, confidential data collaboration on blockchains. | Develops blockchain scaling solutions using STARK technology for Ethereum-secure, fast, and seamless user experiences. |
| Category | Blockchain, Privacy, Security, Enterprise Software | Blockchain, NFT, Crypto, Cryptocurrency |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | QED-it | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 11 | 194 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +15.6% |
| Total funding | $13.0M | $180M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $8.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 20,607 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | QED-it | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 73/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 10/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 40/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | QED-it | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Not detected | Walletconnect |
| Open source | No | Yes |
QED-it vs StarkWare: common questions
Which is better, QED-it or StarkWare?
On our 0-100 score StarkWare rates higher (73/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do QED-it and StarkWare compare on the numbers?
QED-it leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 30/100). StarkWare leads on our overall score (73/100 against 47/100), domain rating (71/100 against 40/100), headcount (194 against 11), funding raised ($180M against $13.0M).
Read the full QED-it review and pricing or the StarkWare review and pricing. You can also browse other QED-it alternatives we track.