QBLOX vs Rhonexum
QBLOX vs Rhonexum, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: QBLOX is on 61/100 and Rhonexum on 43/100.
Where each one leads
QBLOX
- our overall score: 61/100 against 43/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 47/100 against 12/100
- headcount: 183 against 4
- funding raised: $26.0M against $43K
Rhonexum
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | QBLOX | Rhonexum |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Qblox provides modular hardware and software solutions for scalable quantum computer control. | Develops cryogenic electronics for quantum computing and other advanced applications. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Quantum Hardware, Quantum Control Systems, Quantum Technology | Quantum Computing, Semiconductors, Hardware, Deep Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Delft, Netherlands | Lausanne, Switzerland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | QBLOX | Rhonexum |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 183 | 4 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +9.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | $26.0M | $43K |
| Latest round | Series A | Pre-Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 15,366 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | QBLOX | Rhonexum |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 43/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 30/100 |
| Team | 24/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 75/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 47/100 | 12/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | QBLOX | Rhonexum |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
QBLOX vs Rhonexum: common questions
Which is better, QBLOX or Rhonexum?
On our 0-100 score QBLOX rates higher (61/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do QBLOX and Rhonexum compare on the numbers?
QBLOX leads on our overall score (61/100 against 43/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 36/100), domain rating (47/100 against 12/100), headcount (183 against 4), funding raised ($26.0M against $43K).
Read the full QBLOX review and pricing or the Rhonexum review and pricing. You can also browse other QBLOX alternatives we track.