QBLOX vs Quantum Transistors
QBLOX vs Quantum Transistors, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: QBLOX is on 61/100 and Quantum Transistors on 43/100.
Where each one leads
QBLOX
- our overall score: 61/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 49/100 against 8/100
- headcount: 183 against 25
- funding raised: $26.0M against $19.0M
- LinkedIn following: 15,366 against 1,387
Quantum Transistors
- headcount growth: +74.2% against +9.7%
At a glance
| Measure | QBLOX | Quantum Transistors |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Qblox provides modular hardware and software solutions for scalable quantum computer control. | Developing solid-state quantum processors to bring quantum computing to enterprise servers. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, Quantum Hardware, Quantum Control Systems, Quantum Technology | Quantum Computing, Semiconductor, Data Center, Photonic |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Delft, Netherlands | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | QBLOX | Quantum Transistors |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 183 | 25 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +9.7% | +74.2% |
| Total funding | $26.0M | $19.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Grant |
| LinkedIn followers | 15,366 | 1,387 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | QBLOX | Quantum Transistors |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 43/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 51/100 |
| Team | 24/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 75/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 49/100 | 8/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | QBLOX | Quantum Transistors |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
QBLOX vs Quantum Transistors: common questions
Which is better, QBLOX or Quantum Transistors?
On our 0-100 score QBLOX rates higher (61/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do QBLOX and Quantum Transistors compare on the numbers?
QBLOX leads on our overall score (61/100 against 43/100), domain rating (49/100 against 8/100), headcount (183 against 25), funding raised ($26.0M against $19.0M), LinkedIn following (15,366 against 1,387). Quantum Transistors leads on headcount growth (+74.2% against +9.7%).
Read the full QBLOX review and pricing or the Quantum Transistors review and pricing. You can also browse other QBLOX alternatives we track.