Qbiq vs WOLF ARCHITECTS
Qbiq vs WOLF ARCHITECTS, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Qbiq is on 59/100 and WOLF ARCHITECTS on 27/100.
Where each one leads
Qbiq
- our overall score: 59/100 against 27/100
- domain rating: 49/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 104 against 9
- LinkedIn following: 16,423 against 1,026
WOLF ARCHITECTS
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Qbiq | WOLF ARCHITECTS |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Qbiq accelerates real estate space planning from weeks to minutes using AI to generate 3D tours and architectural layouts. | Melbourne-based architecture firm with over 25 years of experience, delivering luxury residential, commercial, and high-end architectural projects across Victoria, Australia. |
| Category | Proptech, Architecture, 3D, Augmented Reality (AR) | Architecture, Luxury Residential Design, Commercial Architecture, Interior Design |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Services |
| Founded | 2019 | 1993 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Malvern East, Australia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Qbiq | WOLF ARCHITECTS |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 104 | 9 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +38.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $26.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 16,423 | 1,026 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Qbiq | WOLF ARCHITECTS |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 27/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 10/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 49/100 | 22/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Qbiq | WOLF ARCHITECTS |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager |
Qbiq vs WOLF ARCHITECTS: common questions
Which is better, Qbiq or WOLF ARCHITECTS?
On our 0-100 score Qbiq rates higher (59/100 against 27/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Qbiq and WOLF ARCHITECTS compare on the numbers?
Qbiq leads on our overall score (59/100 against 27/100), domain rating (49/100 against 22/100), headcount (104 against 9), LinkedIn following (16,423 against 1,026).
Read the full Qbiq review and pricing or the WOLF ARCHITECTS review and pricing. You can also browse other Qbiq alternatives we track.