Qbiq vs Treedis
Qbiq vs Treedis, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Qbiq is on 59/100 and Treedis on 40/100.
Where each one leads
Qbiq
- our overall score: 59/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 104 against 41
- headcount growth: +38.0% against +20.6%
- LinkedIn following: 16,423 against 7,449
Treedis
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 49/100
At a glance
| Measure | Qbiq | Treedis |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Qbiq accelerates real estate space planning from weeks to minutes using AI to generate 3D tours and architectural layouts. | Platform for transforming physical spaces into immersive virtual 3D experiences. |
| Category | Proptech, Architecture, 3D, Augmented Reality (AR) | Digital Twin, 3D, 3D Modeling, Virtual Reality (VR) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Qbiq | Treedis |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 104 | 41 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +38.0% | +20.6% |
| Total funding | $26.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 16,423 | 7,449 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Qbiq | Treedis |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 40/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 16/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 49/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Qbiq | Treedis |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel | Not detected |
Qbiq vs Treedis: common questions
Which is better, Qbiq or Treedis?
On our 0-100 score Qbiq rates higher (59/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Qbiq and Treedis compare on the numbers?
Qbiq leads on our overall score (59/100 against 40/100), headcount (104 against 41), headcount growth (+38.0% against +20.6%), LinkedIn following (16,423 against 7,449). Treedis leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 39/100), domain rating (74/100 against 49/100).
Read the full Qbiq review and pricing or the Treedis review and pricing. You can also browse other Qbiq alternatives we track.