Q-Factor vs Quantinuum
Q-Factor vs Quantinuum, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Q-Factor is on 43/100 and Quantinuum on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Q-Factor
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 36/100
Quantinuum
- our overall score: 66/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 2/100
- headcount: 663 against 13
- funding raised: $1.2B against $24.0M
- LinkedIn following: 62,825 against 1,182
At a glance
| Measure | Q-Factor | Quantinuum |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Q-Factor is a quantum computing startup developing a neutral atom-based quantum computer architecture designed to scale to one million qubits and beyond. | Quantum computing company focused on building fault-tolerant quantum computers and quantum software. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, AI Hardware, Microelectronics & Photonics Solutions, Deep Tech | Quantum Computing, AI Chip, AI Hardware, Quantum Error Correction |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware | software | platform |
| Founded | 2026 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Broomfield, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Q-Factor | Quantinuum |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 13 | 663 |
| Total funding | $24.0M | $1.2B |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| Valuation | Not published | $10K |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,182 | 62,825 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Q-Factor | Quantinuum |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 50/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 2/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Q-Factor | Quantinuum |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Lovable | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Q-Factor vs Quantinuum: common questions
Which is better, Q-Factor or Quantinuum?
On our 0-100 score Quantinuum rates higher (66/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Q-Factor and Quantinuum compare on the numbers?
Q-Factor leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 36/100). Quantinuum leads on our overall score (66/100 against 43/100), domain rating (72/100 against 2/100), headcount (663 against 13), funding raised ($1.2B against $24.0M), LinkedIn following (62,825 against 1,182).
Read the full Q-Factor review and pricing or the Quantinuum review and pricing. You can also browse other Q-Factor alternatives we track.