Q-Factor vs QEDMA
Q-Factor vs QEDMA, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Q-Factor is on 43/100 and QEDMA on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Q-Factor
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 45/100
QEDMA
- our overall score: 56/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 52/100 against 2/100
- headcount: 40 against 13
- funding raised: $40.7M against $24.0M
- LinkedIn following: 5,017 against 1,182
At a glance
| Measure | Q-Factor | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Q-Factor is a quantum computing startup developing a neutral atom-based quantum computer architecture designed to scale to one million qubits and beyond. | Israeli startup developing quantum noise resilience software to improve quantum computing. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, AI Hardware, Microelectronics & Photonics Solutions, Deep Tech | Quantum Computing, Quantum Error Correction, Quantum Software, Operating System |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2026 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Q-Factor | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 13 | 40 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +31.2% |
| Open roles | Not published | 4 |
| Total funding | $24.0M | $40.7M |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,182 | 5,017 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Q-Factor | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 43/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 50/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 2/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Q-Factor | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Lovable | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Q-Factor vs QEDMA: common questions
Which is better, Q-Factor or QEDMA?
On our 0-100 score QEDMA rates higher (56/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Q-Factor and QEDMA compare on the numbers?
Q-Factor leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 45/100). QEDMA leads on our overall score (56/100 against 43/100), domain rating (52/100 against 2/100), headcount (40 against 13), funding raised ($40.7M against $24.0M), LinkedIn following (5,017 against 1,182).
Read the full Q-Factor review and pricing or the QEDMA review and pricing. You can also browse other Q-Factor alternatives we track.