Puppet vs Tines
Puppet vs Tines, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Puppet is on 60/100 and Tines on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Puppet
- domain rating: 82/100 against 73/100
Tines
- our overall score: 66/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 563 against 184
- funding raised: $260M against $121M
At a glance
| Measure | Puppet | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Infrastructure automation and operations platform for managing and securing IT infrastructure at scale. | No-code automation platform for security and IT teams to streamline workflows and enhance productivity. |
| Category | Infrastructure as Code, Configuration Management, IT Automation, DevOps | Security Automation, Workflow Automation, No-Code Platform, IT Operations |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2005 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Portland, United States | Dublin, Ireland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Puppet | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 184 | 563 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -14.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $121M | $260M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 60,516 | 60,286 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Puppet | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 45/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 82/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Puppet | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Puppet vs Tines: common questions
Which is better, Puppet or Tines?
On our 0-100 score Tines rates higher (66/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Puppet and Tines compare on the numbers?
Puppet leads on domain rating (82/100 against 73/100). Tines leads on our overall score (66/100 against 60/100), headcount (563 against 184), funding raised ($260M against $121M).
Read the full Puppet review and pricing or the Tines review and pricing. You can also browse other Puppet alternatives we track.