proteanTecs vs UpKeep
proteanTecs vs UpKeep, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: proteanTecs is on 63/100 and UpKeep on 63/100.
Where each one leads
proteanTecs
- headcount: 226 against 154
- funding raised: $241M against $48.7M
UpKeep
- domain rating: 73/100 against 40/100
- LinkedIn following: 30,765 against 17,969
At a glance
| Measure | proteanTecs | UpKeep |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enabling the electronics industry to scale by transforming reliability and performance monitoring. | AI-native asset operations platform for maintenance, safety, and reliability. |
| Category | Inspection, Predictive Maintenance, IP, Electronics | Asset Operations Management, CMMS, Maintenance Management, Facilities Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Haifa, Israel | Los Angeles, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | proteanTecs | UpKeep |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 226 | 154 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $241M | $48.7M |
| Latest round | Strategic Investment | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $40.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,969 | 30,765 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | proteanTecs | UpKeep |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 90/100 | 84/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 81/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 40/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | proteanTecs | UpKeep |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Not detected |
proteanTecs vs UpKeep: common questions
Which is better, proteanTecs or UpKeep?
Both score the same on our 0-100 rating, so the choice comes down to the 17 data points in the tables above rather than overall company strength.
How do proteanTecs and UpKeep compare on the numbers?
proteanTecs leads on headcount (226 against 154), funding raised ($241M against $48.7M). UpKeep leads on domain rating (73/100 against 40/100), LinkedIn following (30,765 against 17,969).
Read the full proteanTecs review and pricing or the UpKeep review and pricing. You can also browse other proteanTecs alternatives we track.