Progress vs Tonkean
Progress vs Tonkean, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Progress is on 40/100 and Tonkean on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Progress
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 4,205 against 80
- LinkedIn following: 82,292 against 10,015
Tonkean
- our overall score: 62/100 against 40/100
- headcount growth: -0.4% against -5.9%
At a glance
| Measure | Progress | Tonkean |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provides software for creating, deploying, and managing business applications across various environments. | AI-powered platform for enterprise intake and process orchestration, automating workflows for procurement, legal, and IT. |
| Category | Enterprise Software, Application Development, Data Interoperability, SaaS Enablement | Enterprise Software, Workflow Automation, Process Automation, Business Process Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 1981 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Bedford, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Progress | Tonkean |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4,205 | 80 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -5.9% | -0.4% |
| Total funding | Not published | $83.2M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 82,292 | 10,015 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Progress | Tonkean |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 40/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 84/100 | 63/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Progress | Tonkean |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Progress vs Tonkean: common questions
Which is better, Progress or Tonkean?
On our 0-100 score Tonkean rates higher (62/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Progress and Tonkean compare on the numbers?
Progress leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 42/100), domain rating (84/100 against 63/100), headcount (4,205 against 80), LinkedIn following (82,292 against 10,015). Tonkean leads on our overall score (62/100 against 40/100), headcount growth (-0.4% against -5.9%).
Read the full Progress review and pricing or the Tonkean review and pricing. You can also browse other Progress alternatives we track.