Procurent vs QuintoAndar
Procurent vs QuintoAndar, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Procurent is on 11/100 and QuintoAndar on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Procurent
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
QuintoAndar
- our overall score: 59/100 against 11/100
At a glance
| Measure | Procurent | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ProcuRent applies procurement-style scoring to renting — fair, explainable, defensible tenant selection. | Brazilian proptech platform simplifying real estate rentals and sales through technology. |
| Category | Proptech, Rental Management, Compliance, Decision Support | Proptech, Real Estate Technology, Marketplace, Fintech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2026 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Warrington, England | São Paulo, Brazil |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Procurent | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | Not published | $744M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series E (Extension) |
| Valuation | Not published | $5.1B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Procurent | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 11/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 40/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 17/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (55/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Procurent | QuintoAndar |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Lovable | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Payments | Stripe | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment |
Procurent vs QuintoAndar: common questions
Which is better, Procurent or QuintoAndar?
On our 0-100 score QuintoAndar rates higher (59/100 against 11/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Procurent and QuintoAndar compare on the numbers?
QuintoAndar leads on our overall score (59/100 against 11/100).
Read the full Procurent review and pricing or the QuintoAndar review and pricing. You can also browse other Procurent alternatives we track.