Procurent vs Qbiq
Procurent vs Qbiq, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Procurent is on 11/100 and Qbiq on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Procurent
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 39/100
Qbiq
- our overall score: 59/100 against 11/100
At a glance
| Measure | Procurent | Qbiq |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ProcuRent applies procurement-style scoring to renting — fair, explainable, defensible tenant selection. | Qbiq accelerates real estate space planning from weeks to minutes using AI to generate 3D tours and architectural layouts. |
| Category | Proptech, Rental Management, Compliance, Decision Support | Proptech, Architecture, 3D, Augmented Reality (AR) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2026 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Warrington, England | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Procurent | Qbiq |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 104 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +38.0% |
| Total funding | Not published | $26.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 16,423 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Procurent | Qbiq |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 11/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 57/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 17/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (55/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 49/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Procurent | Qbiq |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Lovable | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Payments | Stripe | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel |
Procurent vs Qbiq: common questions
Which is better, Procurent or Qbiq?
On our 0-100 score Qbiq rates higher (59/100 against 11/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Procurent and Qbiq compare on the numbers?
Procurent leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 39/100). Qbiq leads on our overall score (59/100 against 11/100).
Read the full Procurent review and pricing or the Qbiq review and pricing. You can also browse other Procurent alternatives we track.