Procfunc vs Steel.dev
Procfunc vs Steel.dev, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Procfunc is on 23/100 and Steel.dev on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Procfunc
- agent readiness: 64/100 against 54/100
Steel.dev
- our overall score: 58/100 against 23/100
At a glance
| Measure | Procfunc | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A service written as a plain Go function, supervised by lesiw.io/proc for reliability and distribution. | Cloud-based browser API for AI agents, simplifying web automation with anti-bot protection and session persistence. |
| Category | Developer Tools, Infrastructure as Code, Serverless, API Platform | Developer Tools, API Platform, Workflow Automation, AI Agents |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Procfunc | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | Not published | $17.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Procfunc | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 23/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 36/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 16/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 35/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (64/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Procfunc | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Procfunc | Steel.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 3.0/5 from 1 vote |
Procfunc vs Steel.dev: common questions
Which is better, Procfunc or Steel.dev?
On our 0-100 score Steel.dev rates higher (58/100 against 23/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Procfunc and Steel.dev compare on the numbers?
Procfunc leads on agent readiness (64/100 against 54/100). Steel.dev leads on our overall score (58/100 against 23/100).
Read the full Procfunc review and pricing or the Steel.dev review and pricing. You can also browse other Procfunc alternatives we track.