Principal Logistics Technologies vs Shadowfax
Principal Logistics Technologies vs Shadowfax, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Principal Logistics Technologies is on 33/100 and Shadowfax on 59/100.
Where each one leads
Principal Logistics Technologies
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Shadowfax
- our overall score: 59/100 against 33/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 32/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 24/100
At a glance
| Measure | Principal Logistics Technologies | Shadowfax |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provider of enterprise-grade Warehouse Management Software (WMS) and Supply Chain Management (SCM) solutions. | Technology-driven third-party logistics provider for e-commerce and express parcel delivery in India. |
| Category | LogisticsTech, Supply Chain, Warehouse Management Software, Enterprise Software | LogisticsTech, Supply Chain, Fleet Management, E-commerce |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 1990 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Dublin, Ireland | Bengaluru, India |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Principal Logistics Technologies | Shadowfax |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 45 | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $1.2B |
| Latest round | PE | Post-IPO Equity |
| Valuation | Not published | $750M |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,488 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Principal Logistics Technologies | Shadowfax |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 33/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 17/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (32/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 24/100 | 62/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Principal Logistics Technologies | Shadowfax |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Google Cloud |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
Principal Logistics Technologies vs Shadowfax: common questions
Which is better, Principal Logistics Technologies or Shadowfax?
On our 0-100 score Shadowfax rates higher (59/100 against 33/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Principal Logistics Technologies and Shadowfax compare on the numbers?
Shadowfax leads on our overall score (59/100 against 33/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 32/100), domain rating (62/100 against 24/100).
Read the full Principal Logistics Technologies review and pricing or the Shadowfax review and pricing. You can also browse other Principal Logistics Technologies alternatives we track.