Postgres MCP vs Supabase
Postgres MCP vs Supabase, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Postgres MCP is on 10/100 and Supabase on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Postgres MCP
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Supabase
- our overall score: 70/100 against 10/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 22/100
At a glance
| Measure | Postgres MCP | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server bridging AI assistants and PostgreSQL databases. | Open source Firebase alternative with a PostgreSQL backend and real-time capabilities. |
| Category | Database, AI Infrastructure, API Platform, Generative AI | Database, Backend as a Service, Developer Tools, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2024 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Postgres MCP | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 342 |
| Total funding | Not published | $933M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $11B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 99,093 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Postgres MCP | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 10/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 29/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 72/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | C (66/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Postgres MCP | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
Postgres MCP vs Supabase: common questions
Which is better, Postgres MCP or Supabase?
On our 0-100 score Supabase rates higher (70/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Postgres MCP and Supabase compare on the numbers?
Supabase leads on our overall score (70/100 against 10/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 22/100).
Read the full Postgres MCP review and pricing or the Supabase review and pricing. You can also browse other Postgres MCP alternatives we track.